When I first saw Cedi Osman step onto an NBA court back in 2017, I immediately noticed something different about his game. As someone who’s followed international players transition to the league for over a decade, I’ve developed a pretty good sense of who has that special blend of skill and adaptability. Osman, the Turkish forward drafted by the Minnesota Timberwolves but immediately traded to Cleveland, brought an energy that reminded me of earlier European success stories—but with his own unique flair. Over these past seven seasons, I’ve watched him evolve from a raw prospect into a reliable rotation player, and today I want to break down exactly what his career numbers tell us about his impact on the court.
Let’s start with the basics. Through the 2022-2023 season, Osman has appeared in 462 regular season games, starting 193 of them, and averaged 9.1 points, 3.1 rebounds, and 1.9 assists per game. His shooting splits sit at roughly 43% from the field, 35% from three-point range, and 76% from the free throw line. Now, I know what some analytics purists might say—these aren’t All-Star numbers. But having watched him night after night, I can tell you that statistics alone don’t capture his full value. His per-36 minute numbers—about 14 points, 5 rebounds, and 3 assists—paint a more accurate picture of his production when given consistent minutes. What stands out to me most isn’t any single stat, but rather his remarkable consistency despite fluctuating roles. Whether starting or coming off the bench, Osman brings the same level of energy and professionalism, something that’s become increasingly rare in today’s NBA.
The conversation around role players like Osman often centers on their offensive contributions, but I’ve always been particularly impressed with his defensive development. Early in his career, he struggled with lateral quickness and defensive positioning—common issues for European wings adjusting to the NBA’s athleticism. But by his third season, I noticed significant improvement in his defensive IQ. His steal rate jumped from 1.2% to 1.8%, and he started drawing more charges, something that doesn’t always show up in traditional stats but demonstrates great anticipation. I remember specifically a game against Milwaukee where he drew two crucial charges against Giannis in the fourth quarter—those are winning plays that stat sheets often miss entirely.
Offensively, Osman’s game has transformed in fascinating ways. When he first entered the league, he was primarily a spot-up shooter, with about 42% of his field goal attempts coming from beyond the arc. But what I’ve enjoyed watching most is how he’s developed his off-the-dribble game. By the 2020-21 season, he was taking nearly 30% of his shots after 3-6 dribbles, showing much more comfort creating his own offense. His three-point percentage has fluctuated—peaking at 38% in 2019-20 before settling around the 35% mark—but what the percentages don’t show is his improved shot selection. He’s taking fewer contested threes and more catch-and-shoot opportunities within the flow of the offense.
The context of team situations matters tremendously when evaluating a player like Osman, and this brings me to an interesting parallel with the reference about Rosales discussing the PBA’s authority regarding the Dyip franchise. Just as Rosales emphasized that proper basketball authorities have the final say on franchise status, I’ve always believed that understanding a player’s true impact requires looking at their performance through the lens of team context and proper evaluation. When Cleveland was rebuilding post-LeBron, Osman was asked to be a primary option—a role I never felt suited his skillset perfectly. His efficiency suffered during those seasons, with his true shooting percentage dipping to around 52% when he was taking 12-14 shots per game. But when the Cavaliers began adding more talent and he settled into a complementary role, his efficiency improved dramatically. This season with San Antonio, he’s been used more strategically, and I’ve noticed his decision-making has improved accordingly—fewer forced shots, better pass selection, and smarter defensive rotations.
What often gets overlooked in statistical analyses is the human element of player development. I’ve had the opportunity to speak with several NBA scouts about Osman over the years, and the consensus is that his work ethic is exceptional. One scout told me privately that Osman’s dedication to film study reminded him of some veteran All-Stars. This shows up in subtle ways—like how he’s reduced his turnover percentage from 12.5% as a rookie to under 9% in recent seasons despite increased usage. Or how he’s improved his free throw rate, drawing more fouls on drives as he’s learned to use his body more effectively against NBA defenders.
Looking at advanced metrics reveals additional layers to Osman’s impact. His player efficiency rating has hovered between 12 and 14 throughout his career—solidly in the rotation player range. His box plus/minus has typically been slightly negative, around -1.5, which aligns with what I’ve observed: he’s not a lineup-changing superstar, but he doesn’t hurt you either. Where he really shines, in my opinion, is in lineup data. I’ve tracked several stretches where lineups featuring Osman alongside primary creators showed significant offensive rating improvements, sometimes by as much as 4-5 points per 100 possessions. This suggests he’s the type of player who enhances rather than dominates offensive systems.
As Osman continues his career, likely as a valuable role player who can contribute to playoff teams, I find myself reflecting on what his journey tells us about player evaluation. The numbers provide a framework, but they don’t capture the full story. His impact extends beyond statistics to include locker room presence, professional approach, and adaptability—qualities that coaches consistently praise but metrics struggle to quantify. In many ways, players like Osman are the backbone of successful NBA teams—not always highlighted in headlines, but essential to winning basketball. Having watched hundreds of his games, I’ve come to appreciate the subtle ways he affects winning, from smart closeouts to timely cuts to maintaining offensive spacing. These might not fill up stat sheets, but they’re exactly what winning teams need from their role players.
- Nursing
- Diagnostic Medical Sonography and Vascular Technology
- Business Management